Aurora is on version 2.5.0 C#, available at the Aurora Forums.
Contact Erik on the forum for a wiki account.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Armor"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Rename?: new section) |
(→Penetration Mechanics: new section) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The official in game spelling is Armour not Armor --[[User:Mor|Mor]] ([[User talk:Mor|talk]]) 17:29, 31 January 2016 (PST) | The official in game spelling is Armour not Armor --[[User:Mor|Mor]] ([[User talk:Mor|talk]]) 17:29, 31 January 2016 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Penetration Mechanics == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Some original research has revealed that I was pretty wrong about some aspects of the penetration writeup. Gauss and Railgun do in fact still take a 2-height pyramid, and lasers have some downright wonky behavior at high damage values, penetrating for 4 or even 5 vertical increments consecutively. The same behavior is unlikely to occur anywhere else due to the lack of damage or, in the case of missiles, simple template definition. Lasers are definitely not as simple as a "3-step pyramid", though. | ||
| + | |||
| + | https://imgur.com/a/YjeRI | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:TMarkos|TMarkos]] ([[User talk:TMarkos|talk]]) 18:56, 4 February 2016 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 02:56, 5 February 2016
Rename?
The official in game spelling is Armour not Armor --Mor (talk) 17:29, 31 January 2016 (PST)
Penetration Mechanics
Some original research has revealed that I was pretty wrong about some aspects of the penetration writeup. Gauss and Railgun do in fact still take a 2-height pyramid, and lasers have some downright wonky behavior at high damage values, penetrating for 4 or even 5 vertical increments consecutively. The same behavior is unlikely to occur anywhere else due to the lack of damage or, in the case of missiles, simple template definition. Lasers are definitely not as simple as a "3-step pyramid", though.