Aurora is on version 2.5.0 C#, available at the Aurora Forums.
Contact Erik on the forum for a wiki account.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Armor"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Penetration Mechanics: new section) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
[[User:TMarkos|TMarkos]] ([[User talk:TMarkos|talk]]) 18:56, 4 February 2016 (PST) | [[User:TMarkos|TMarkos]] ([[User talk:TMarkos|talk]]) 18:56, 4 February 2016 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : If you planning to extrapolate a formula beware of rounding issues. Also you might want to try to ask Steve. I try not to PM him too often, unless I can't avoid it, but so far he was very helpful every time.--[[User:Mor|Mor]] ([[User talk:Mor|talk]]) 20:28, 4 February 2016 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 04:28, 5 February 2016
Rename?
The official in game spelling is Armour not Armor --Mor (talk) 17:29, 31 January 2016 (PST)
Penetration Mechanics
Some original research has revealed that I was pretty wrong about some aspects of the penetration writeup. Gauss and Railgun do in fact still take a 2-height pyramid, and lasers have some downright wonky behavior at high damage values, penetrating for 4 or even 5 vertical increments consecutively. The same behavior is unlikely to occur anywhere else due to the lack of damage or, in the case of missiles, simple template definition. Lasers are definitely not as simple as a "3-step pyramid", though.